← FXAbsolute A-Backtest vs FXAbsolute

A-Backtest vs FXAbsolute: Two Genuinely Free Backtesters Compared

Checked 10 September 2026 · every competitor fact read from their own site on that date

FX
FXAbsolute Research Team
Published at fxabsolute.com · Checked 10 September 2026
These two are the unusual pair in this category: both are actually free, with no tier above them waiting to be sold to you. So the comparison is not about price at all. It is about what arrives already loaded and what you have to bring yourself.

Side by side

A-BacktestFXAbsolute
Price Free, funded by voluntary donations, with no paid tier Free, with no paid tier above it
Instruments Bitcoin, Ethereum and gold built in; forex by importing your own data 15
Timeframes 6 10
Historical data Not stated for the built-in markets 5 years of 1-minute bars, 2021 to 2026
Indicators 82, plus custom indicators written in JavaScript Unlimited — every indicator, at once
Saved sessions No stated limit Unlimited
Trades per session No stated limit Unlimited
Account needed No card required to start None on a first visit; a free account from the second
Download needed None — it runs in the browser None — it runs in the browser

Prices and limits change. Everything in the A-Backtest column was read from their own site on 10 September 2026. Check it there before you decide anything on the strength of this page.

Where A-Backtest is the better choice

Stated first, and plainly, because a comparison published by one of the two tools is worth nothing if it wins every row.

Indicators

82 against this site’s handful, plus custom indicators in JavaScript. If you build your own studies, that is not a close call.

Drawing tools

36, including a pitchfork. FXAbsolute has the common set and no more.

Speed control

Replay from 0.5x to 10x with rewind.

Where FXAbsolute is the better choice

Forex data, already there

A-Backtest states forex is available by importing your own data. FXAbsolute ships 15 instruments with 28.4 million one-minute Dukascopy bid bars already loaded, so there is nothing to source, clean or upload before your first session.

Timeframes

Ten against six.

Provenance you can check

Every study on this site publishes the SHA-256 of the exact data file behind it. You can verify the numbers rather than trust them.

An agent connection

FXAbsolute ships an MCP server, so Claude or another coding agent can read the same charts and run the same tests. No API key and no account.

Which one should you use

Pick A-Backtest if you live in indicators, write your own, or mostly trade crypto and gold. Pick FXAbsolute if you trade forex and want five years of clean one-minute history to be there when you open the page, without sourcing a data file first.

What FXAbsolute costs

Nothing, and there is no tier above it. All 15 instruments, all 10 timeframes, every indicator and drawing tool, unlimited sessions, unlimited trades, the journal and the full analytics, at no cost and with no card. Your first visit asks for nothing at all; from the second you are asked for a free account, which unlocks nothing because nothing is locked — it exists so a returning trader can be reached.

Open the backtester Read the guide

Frequently Asked Questions

Is A-Backtest really free?

Yes, as checked on 10 September 2026. Their site states that starting, learning and using it are free, with no paid tier and no ads, funded by voluntary donations.

Which is better for forex, A-Backtest or FXAbsolute?

FXAbsolute, on the data question alone. A-Backtest lists Bitcoin, Ethereum and gold as built in and describes forex as available through importing your own data. FXAbsolute ships fifteen instruments with five years of one-minute history already loaded.

Which has more indicators?

A-Backtest, by a wide margin: 82 plus custom JavaScript indicators, against a small standard set here. If your method depends on an unusual study, that is the stronger tool.

Do I need an account for either?

Neither asks for one to start. FXAbsolute asks for a free account from your second visit; it unlocks nothing, because nothing is locked.

Other comparisons